Krita for mac m1 full#
I should also mention that I'm using 27" 2560x1440 display at its full native resolution and don't have any display scaling enabled in macOS.
That's how I teached myself to forget all these odd zoom levels and work strictly at 100% and sometimes go to 200% or 400% to better handle small details if needed. That's typically enough for getting an ok image quality. Somehow it doesn't happen between 100% and 200%. I started to dig down the problem and found that for any zoom levels below 100% AP runs one pass of Bilinear resampling. this default AP behaviour of fitting the canvas to the window instead of showing 100%. That was the moment I felt something is not quite right with the image quality. Very first time I noticed this was the moment I created a new document and you know. Now I'm finding this strange as I'm also on macOS right now and I'm experiencing exactly the same issues as RSĪs far as I can remember, AP canvas preview always was a bit jagged and distorted for me at any odd zoom levels between 100% and 200%. Left my 137,9%, right you very much for your time taking these tests for us. But I always get nice rendering of test fonts when I try today.
Krita for mac m1 windows#
I had occasional issues on Windows where the rendering froze in "rough" state, and never concluded to "fine" state. I only say Ii'm unable to reproduce the issue on 6 different devices (2 Windows PCs, 1 MacOS, 3 iPad). To be clear: I don't say the problem does not exist. 2021).Ĭan you share the exact afphoto file, and a screenshot of Performance settings? Cannot reproduce on Mac or iPad.Īnd I didn't get such issues when still on Windows (until Dec. Just to illustrate this a bit better I prepared an image comparing the canvas shown at different zoom levels.ġ00% and 200% are properly and evenly resampled while any intermediate ones are a rough upscales of a previous (100%/200%/.) mipmap without any resampling. Probably a performance optimization or something like this. Seems to be a global thing for AP and how it renders the canvas.ītw, both Designer and Publisher always use Bilinear at all zoom levels in vector mode but their raster personas behave similarily to AP. Thanks for your visible or rasterize have no visible effect on perceived rendering quality when viewing at such odd zoom levels. Could it be worthwhile to give AP a try on this machine? I assume that Affinity must have sitting somewhere a Mac with M1 chip running Mojave 12.5. Again I am convinced that there must be a relation between my observations in AP and Mojave 12.5. I would be glad, if anyone out there could confirm my observations. Compared to my jagged text display your image looks sharp enough at any zoom level to me, M . My problem is that the text that was previously sharp and crispy at any zoom level is now jagged and distorted after the macOS 12.5 update.
Regarding M and : I am not sure, if I understood your suggestions.
Krita for mac m1 update#
I had the setting already set to BEST quality and before the update it worked perfect with a beautiful rendering of text. Unfortunately and nevertheless changing the options you are referring to do not alter the situation at all. There is a similar setting page, but with different options in detail (see screenshot). The settings you are referring to seems to stem from a PC, I am on a MacBook Pro. It looks like you have altered the render quality in your settings, change this to automatic/best and it should resolve it.įor trying to support me.
0 kommentar(er)
